In a landmark move that signals a new phase in the battle between creative industries and artificial intelligence companies, Disney and Universal have filed a sweeping lawsuit against AI image generator Midjourney. The 143-page complaint, lodged in a California federal court, accuses Midjourney of extensive copyright infringement, labelling the company a “bottomless pit of plagiarism” and a “virtual vending machine” for unauthorised reproductions.
The Disney Universal Midjourney lawsuit is the first major legal action brought by Hollywood studios against an AI firm and is expected to have profound implications for the future of generative AI technology and intellectual property law.
Disney and Universal Sue Midjourney
The Crux of the Allegations
The lawsuit alleges that San Francisco-based Midjourney trained its AI models using copyrighted content from Disney and Universal without permission, then enabled users to generate countless images of famous characters such as Darth Vader, Elsa from Frozen, Bart Simpson, and Shrek.
According to the Disney Universal Midjourney lawsuit, this practice amounts to large-scale digital piracy. “By helping itself to Plaintiffs’ copyrighted works, and then distributing images that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney’s and Universal’s famous characters – without investing a penny in their creation – Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider,” the complaint states.
In essence, the studios argue that Midjourney profited off their decades-long investment in creativity and intellectual property by offering near-instant, AI-generated images that rely on stolen content.
‘Piracy Is Piracy’, Says Disney
Horacio Gutierrez, Disney’s senior executive vice president and chief legal and compliance officer, didn’t mince words. “Piracy is piracy, and the fact that it’s done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing,” he told ABC News. He added that Disney remains optimistic about the potential of AI but stressed that the technology must respect copyright laws.
Disney and Universal claim they reached out to Midjourney before filing the suit, urging the company to implement safeguards to prevent unauthorised image generation. According to the complaint, Midjourney ignored these requests and continued improving its image generation tools without regard for copyright protections.
A photo of Disney’s Mickey Mouse is seen outside the Disney Store in Times Square, New York City, on December 14, 2017. Disney and Universal have filed a lawsuit against AI image generator Midjourney, accusing it of copyright infringement. (Credit: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
AI vs. Copyright: The Legal Battleground
The Disney Universal Midjourney lawsuit is the latest escalation in the growing tension between AI developers and copyright holders. While independent artists have previously sued generative AI companies over the use of their works in training datasets, this is the first time major studios have taken legal action.
Midjourney, a startup with a self-reported team of 11 full-time staff, has defended its practices in the past by likening AI learning to human learning. CEO David Holz previously said, “To the extent that AIs are learning like people, it’s sort of the same thing. If the images come out differently, then it seems like it’s fine.”
However, Disney and Universal disagree. They argue that Midjourney does not just learn from their content, but replicates it in high detail, often producing images that could confuse consumers and dilute brand identity.
Legal Stakes: Up to $20 Million or More
The studios are seeking damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work. With more than 150 allegedly infringed titles listed in the complaint, the potential payout could exceed $20 million. They’re also demanding a court order to bar Midjourney from further copyright violations.
According to reports, Midjourney generated over $US300 million (roughly $A460 million) in revenue last year through paid subscriptions. Despite being a relatively small operation, its influence and market penetration have grown rapidly. Disney and Universal argue that such earnings come at the expense of original content creators.
Also Read: US Evacuates Personnel from Iran and the Middle East Amid Rising Tensions
Public and Industry Reaction
The Motion Picture Association voiced support for the lawsuit. CEO Charles Rivkin called copyright protection “the backbone of our industry” and stressed the need for a “balanced approach to AI that protects intellectual property while embracing human-centred innovation.”
Meanwhile, the public and creative industries are watching closely. Many see the Disney Universal Midjourney lawsuit as a test case for how copyright will be enforced in the AI era.
Will This Reshape AI Development?
Legal experts suggest that if Disney and Universal prevail, the case could force AI companies to re-evaluate their data sourcing and copyright compliance practices. Already, some AI firms have begun exploring licensing deals with rights holders or limiting the scope of image generation to avoid legal trouble.
Midjourney has not issued a formal response but addressed the lawsuit indirectly during a weekly conference call. “I think Midjourney is going to be around for a very long time,” Holz said. “I think everybody wants us to be around.”
A Pivotal Moment for Creativity and AI
As AI tools become increasingly embedded in creative workflows, the Disney Universal Midjourney lawsuit underscores the urgent need to reconcile technological advancement with the rights of creators.
Whether this leads to stricter regulations, industry-wide licensing agreements, or a dramatic shift in how AI is developed remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the eyes of the world are now on this high-stakes courtroom showdown.
