In the first major televised event of the federal election campaign, the leaders of Canada’s four main political parties squared off in a spirited French-language debate that tackled everything from energy and immigration to international trade and Donald Trump. Held in Montreal, the debate gave voters in Quebec — and across Canada — a chance to evaluate the candidates’ fluency in French, their grasp of regional concerns, and their broader national visions.
While the tone remained largely civil, tensions simmered throughout the night as the leaders clashed over key policy issues and sought to position themselves as the most capable steward of Canada’s future.
Carney Draws Fire in Debate Debut
Liberal Leader Mark Carney, making his first appearance in a national leaders’ debate, quickly became the central target of the evening. Despite being the newest political figure on the stage, Carney was repeatedly challenged by his opponents — a sign, some observers noted, of his perceived frontrunner status.
Carney initially struggled to insert himself into the rapid back-and-forth exchanges but grew more confident as the debate progressed. He addressed questions on the economy, Canada’s approach to Donald Trump, and energy transition policies. While he avoided any major missteps, his opponents criticized his promises as unrealistic. Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet dismissed Carney’s platform as a “Harry Potter budget,” accusing him of promoting magical solutions that promised both spending and tax relief.
Carney brushed off the attacks with a bit of humor: “I just got here,” he said, highlighting his recent entry into federal politics while defending his credibility as a former central banker.
Poilievre Takes a Calmer Approach — But Stirs Controversy
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, known for his combative style in Parliament, adopted a more measured tone throughout the night. Speaking in fluent French, Poilievre emphasized economic growth, affordability, and energy independence. He made headlines during the debate by clearly stating “yes” when asked if he would increase oil production — a move that plays well in Western Canada but risks alienating voters in Quebec, where environmental concerns run high.
Poilievre also faced pointed questions about whether he would impose pipeline projects without full consent from Indigenous communities. While he emphasized consultation, he stopped short of guaranteeing veto power — a position likely to spark continued debate.
On the cultural front, Poilievre reaffirmed his plan to defund the CBC, but sought to reassure Quebecers by pledging to protect Radio-Canada, the public broadcaster’s French-language arm.
Also read: Search Underway for $30 Million Powerball Winner in WA
Singh Pushes for Health Care, Battles Format
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh focused his message on affordability, health care, and social justice. However, Singh grew visibly frustrated as he was repeatedly interrupted or cut off by the debate’s moderator. At one point, he openly criticized the format, claiming it prevented him from fully engaging on issues like national pharmacare and dental coverage.
Despite these challenges, Singh was able to distinguish himself by calling for more compassionate immigration policies and equitable treatment of workers. He emphasized that his party would resist corporate tax breaks and instead focus on improving public services for ordinary Canadians.
Blanchet Defends Quebec’s Interests
Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet remained firmly focused on Quebec sovereignty and provincial autonomy. He argued that Canada’s federal policies often prioritize Ontario over Quebec, citing tariffs and trade relief measures as evidence. “We have paid lumber tariffs for years, while Ontario gets billions in support the moment Trump threatens auto exports,” he said.
Blanchet also took the opportunity to speculate on Quebec’s hypothetical foreign policy as an independent nation. When asked how Quebec would handle a future Trump presidency, Blanchet replied that “alliances must be built between equals,” emphasizing his belief in sovereignty and self-determination.
While Blanchet is unlikely to gain traction outside Quebec, his targeted messaging may help the Bloc shore up support in its traditional strongholds.
No Knockouts — But Plenty to Chew On
Though the debate featured moments of tension and ideological clash, it never devolved into a shouting match. Analysts were quick to note the lack of a clear winner — or loser. Carney managed to hold his ground despite being under constant attack. Poilievre delivered his message with restraint, though his energy policies may prove polarizing. Singh faced structural hurdles but still conveyed his core priorities. And Blanchet successfully reinforced the Bloc’s brand as Quebec’s voice in Ottawa.
With the English-language debate scheduled for tomorrow night, attention now shifts to how leaders will perform in front of a broader national audience. With the campaign entering its final stretch, time is running out for parties to shift momentum. But if tonight’s event is any indication, the path to victory remains wide open.
