Return of a Cult Franchise
Danny Boyle and Alex Garland have reunited for 28 Years Later, a sequel to the 2002 cult horror 28 Days Later. The film, released in Australia on 19 June, blends post-apocalyptic horror, medieval survival, and psychological drama. It follows a self-governing island community that has survived decades of quarantine after a blood-borne virus outbreak devastated mainland Britain.
A Sequel Years in the Making
The original 28 Days Later redefined the zombie-apocalypse genre in 2002 using guerrilla filmmaking across an empty London. Its commercial and critical success spawned 28 Weeks Later in 2007, though that sequel faltered. Now, 28 Years Later marks the franchise’s return with the original creators. The film is the first in a planned trilogy. Garland has written the second instalment titled 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, which is already completed and slated for release in January.
A Changed Creative Landscape
Since the original release, Boyle has won an Oscar for Slumdog Millionaire while Garland has moved into directing politically themed works like Civil War. In 28 Years Later, the director’s commercial instincts and the screenwriter’s political focus sometimes clash. Yet the result remains consistently dynamic. Ralph Fiennes joins the cast in a pivotal role, entering halfway through and shifting the film’s tone. His character becomes the moral and psychological centre of the narrative.
Holy Island’s Isolated Survival
Set on Holy Island off England’s northeast coast, the story opens in a fortress-like society where survivors depend on medieval methods. Residents burn wood for fuel and craft arrows for hunting. Mainland Britain, still infected, is accessible only via a causeway at low tide. European forces monitor the borders. France and Sweden patrol the surrounding waters to enforce Britain’s isolation. These details highlight themes of global quarantine and geopolitical containment.
The Family Journey and Hunter Culture
Aaron Taylor-Johnson portrays Jamie, a protective father living on the island. Jodie Comer plays Isla, his ailing wife, who remains bedridden. Their son Spike, played by Alfie Williams, prepares for his first trip to the mainland. He must kill an infected as part of a survival ritual. The film captures their journey with kinetic action sequences. Boyle uses fast cuts and dynamic camera movements to amplify tension during their escape from the infected.
Visceral Threat of the Infected
The infected resemble zombies but are victims of the same rage virus introduced in the original film. Over two decades, they have evolved. Some, referred to as “Slow-Lows,” crawl on all fours. Others move quickly and attack with cunning. They appear naked, dirt-covered and bleed profusely when struck. These confrontations highlight the film’s horror focus, contrasting with the quieter island scenes. The infected now function more as primal forces than recognisable individuals.
Psychological Shift with Fiennes
Fiennes plays Kelton, a former doctor living alone on the mainland. Spike believes Kelton may cure Isla despite warnings of his instability. Kelton lives in a bone temple, surrounded by skulls and tall columns. He explains, “Excuse my appearance. I paint myself in iodine. The virus doesn’t like iodine at all.” The temple serves as a memento mori, reminding Kelton of lost humanity. Fiennes delivers a layered performance, balancing madness with compassion.
Also Read: Claire Foy Dives into Personal History on Who Do You Think You Are?
Themes of War and Isolation
The film uses a 1915 Rudyard Kipling poem, Boots, set against historic war images. It draws parallels between modern plague and ancient conflicts. Archival footage of Agincourt archers supports this narrative. It suggests that the island’s survivalism is rooted in outdated warfare. Yet the political commentary fades mid-film, never fully explored. The use of visual references and scratchy recordings strengthens the film’s thematic ambitions despite some inconsistency.
Comparisons to The Last of Us
The film’s visual aesthetic draws comparisons to The Last of Us. However, it lacks equivalent emotional weight in early scenes. Spike’s character development remains minimal. A subplot involving a pregnant infected woman appears implausible even for a horror setting. These elements detract from the narrative’s emotional depth.
Franchise Future and Cameos
Two significant cameos shift the tone unexpectedly, hinting at future franchise directions. These moments blend graphic-novel surrealism with franchise-building intent. They introduce new arcs for upcoming instalments while offering moments of shock and reflection. The film ends on an open note, setting the stage for its sequel.
Conclusion
28 Years Later presents a visually ambitious but narratively uneven continuation of the 28 Days Later legacy. It revisits old horrors through a generational lens while exploring isolation, survival, and sanity. The franchise’s future appears secure with another film completed and more to come. Fiennes’s performance elevates the story and redefines its emotional core.
