U.S. President Donald Trump is under intense scrutiny after a surprise shift in trade policy sent global markets soaring, prompting allegations of insider trading and market manipulation. The controversy erupted when Trump posted a cryptic but bullish message on his social media platform Truth Social, just hours before announcing a 90-day suspension of new trade tariffs on most countries, excluding China.
The message, posted Wednesday morning, read simply: “THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!! DJT.” Within hours, Trump made the surprise policy announcement, catching investors off guard but triggering a dramatic rally across global markets. The S&P 500 surged over 9%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq rose by more than 12%. International markets followed suit, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 gaining 9% and London’s FTSE 100 climbing as much as 4% in early Thursday trading.
The fallout was immediate. Critics from both sides of the aisle raised concerns about whether the President’s post constituted a deliberate effort to influence markets for personal or political gain. The use of “DJT” at the end of his post raised additional eyebrows, as those initials match the stock ticker symbol of Trump Media & Technology Group — the company behind Truth Social — whose shares jumped 22% following the post.
Democratic Leaders Demand Accountability
Leading Democratic lawmakers wasted no time in demanding answers. Senator Adam Schiff called for a formal investigation into whether anyone within Trump’s circle engaged in insider trading, using non-public information ahead of the policy shift.
“These constant policy flip-flops create fertile ground for insider trading,” Schiff said. “The American people deserve to know who knew what, and when. Did anyone within the administration take advantage of privileged information to profit while average investors were left in the dark?”
Senator Chris Murphy echoed the sentiment, warning that a scandal was “brewing.” Posting on X (formerly Twitter), Murphy argued, “Trump’s 9:30am tweet makes it clear he was eager for his people to make money off the private info only he knew. So who knew ahead of time and how much money did they make?”
Meanwhile, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez pushed for immediate transparency from Congress itself. “I’ve been hearing some interesting chatter on the floor,” she posted. “Disclosure deadline is May 15th. We’re about to learn a few things. It’s time to ban insider trading in Congress.”
Also Read: Peabody’s $5.7 Billion Coal Deal in Jeopardy After Mine Explosion
White House Dismisses Concerns
In response, the White House dismissed the criticism, describing the President’s decision as a strategic move that had been “under discussion for days.” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the timing of the post was coincidental and portrayed the move as a masterstroke in negotiation tactics.
“It’s the art of the deal,” Leavitt told reporters. “President Trump always plays his hand close to the chest and then delivers results for the American people.”
When asked by reporters when he finalized the decision to pause tariffs, Trump responded vaguely: “For a period of a time. I would say this morning. Over the last few days, I’ve been thinking about it.”
Stock Purchases by Allies Under Spotlight
Further fueling controversy are recent stock purchases by several prominent Republicans, including Trump ally Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. Financial disclosures revealed Greene bought shares in major technology firms Amazon and Apple on April 3 and 4, just after market downturns triggered by Trump’s initial tariff threats on April 2. Both stocks saw double-digit gains following Wednesday’s announcement, raising concerns about whether lawmakers benefited from foreknowledge of the policy pivot.
Greene has denied any wrongdoing, stating that her purchases were routine investments made during a market dip and had no connection to privileged information.
Legal and Ethical Implications
Experts say the incident could test legal boundaries around market manipulation and the ethical standards of public office. While presidents are not barred from posting about the economy, the timing of Trump’s message — coupled with the market response and the benefit to a company he is closely linked with — could raise questions under federal securities laws.
“While proving criminal intent in cases involving public figures is difficult, the optics here are undeniably troubling,” said Jacob Bernstein, a legal analyst and former SEC counsel. “The overlap between public policy and private gain needs to be thoroughly examined.”
Calls for Reforms Grow Louder
The incident has reignited calls to ban individual stock trading by members of Congress and public officials. Advocacy groups and bipartisan lawmakers have long pushed for legislation that would require officials to divest from individual stocks or place their holdings in blind trusts.
“This is yet another reminder of why public servants should not be allowed to trade stocks,” said Senator Elizabeth Warren. “We need to restore faith in our institutions, and that starts with eliminating any appearance of impropriety.”
What Comes Next?
With Trump continuing to defend his actions as part of a broader economic strategy and his opponents calling for full transparency, the coming days are likely to see heightened political tension. Congressional committees may launch formal investigations, and watchdog groups are expected to file complaints with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For now, markets remain buoyant on the news of tariff relief — but the political and ethical storm surrounding the president is only gaining strength. Whether it results in concrete action or fades into the background of a volatile election year remains to be seen.
