The incident that sparked the Brown University manhunt was a mass shooting that happened on December 13, 2025, resulting in a death toll of two and eight victims. This unfolding situation led to an instant investigation by the police, both local and federal.
As the emergency services cordoned off different locations, the university ordered its students to stay in their rooms. Coming on the heels of an already tense exam period, the event spread fear even more throughout the university community. The shooter at Brown University was already gone, but authorities were very quick to mobilise all state and federal resources.
The law enforcement agencies regarded the case as complicated owing to the low immediate forensic clarity. Public alert notices were issued within a few hours as the investigators who were trying to locate the suspect were moving very fast.
The Brown University shooting killed two, wounded eight, prompting an investigation
Why Was The Wrong Man Publicly Identified?
The manhunt for the Brown University shooter took a significant turn when a person of interest was apprehended, and the information was made public. “This, by my account, is going to take a while, just bear with us”, Khan Patel, the FBI Chief, said on social media, confirming the arrest, while the Mayor of Providence, Brett Smiley, reassured the residents that they could feel safer.
But then, detectives found some serious problems with the identification. Cell phone tower information that was relied on to locate the man did not show his phone being at the shooting site.
Besides, the police came to understand that the suspect’s phone had not been recognised at all during the shooting, as one of the signals was present. These discoveries immediately led to doubts about the suspect’s involvement internally.
How Did Forensic Evidence Change The Investigation?
During the Brown University manhunt, forensic testing rapidly dismantled the case against the detained person. The DNA from the shell casings did not correspond to that of the man. Moreover, he was found in possession of two pistols and sealed in the room where the bullets were from, but tests showed no match between the two.
The test of gunshot residue on the man’s hands was negative, which was another point against the case. The investigators declared that there was no forensic basis to link him to the Brown University shooting, and later that Sunday, he was released after a series of internal reviews.
Forensics disproved the detained man’s link to the Brown University shooting
What Role Did Federal Agencies Play?
The Brown University manhunt is still a state and locally led investigation with federal agencies offering technical support. After the weekend that had raised tensions, the officials regrouped, and additional federal resources were deployed.
The investigators accentuated the cooperation on the ground despite the frustrations with public communications from the senior leadership. The FBI later declared a $50,000 reward for information that would lead to the identification and conviction of the Brown University shooter.
Authorities are still analysing surveillance footage and digital data to help them with the reconstruction of the suspect’s movements before and after the shooting.
Why Did Officials Criticise Public Announcements?
Rhode Island officials were very critical of the early public statements, branding them as premature and detrimental to the investigation. The leaking of unverified information was seen as a risk to misguide the public and redirect the resources.
The officials were very clear that the confidence in the investigative work must be supported by confirmed evidence. Attorney General Peter Neronha pointed out that there was no factual basis at all to treat the man who had been detained as a suspect.
He asserted that misjudgments of the investigation had happened due to inexperience and the pressure that was put on during the early stages of the manhunt.
Rhode Island officials condemned premature statements during the Brown University manhunt
Where Does The Brown University Manhunt Stand Now?
The Brown University manhunt is still on, and the investigators are continuing to explore other leads. The authorities have stated that the other persons of interest are still being investigated.
The suspect is still not captured, and the officials are asking the public to share any relevant footage or tips.
Security on campus is still tight, and the students and staff are slowly getting used to the uncertainty that is going on. Law enforcement is still saying that the investigation is moving forward, even with the early mistakes that caused a loss of momentum.
Also Read: Bondi Beach Hanukkah Terror Attack Leaves 12 Dead and 29 Injured in Targeted Shooting
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What caused the Brown University manhunt?
The manhunt was triggered by a shooting incident on the campus that resulted in two fatalities and eight injuries.
Q2: Why was the wrong suspect released?
Forensic analysis indicated no DNA, ballistic, or residue connections to the shooting.
Q3: Is the Brown University shooter still at large?
Yes, the suspect remains unidentified and unapprehended so far.
Q4: Is there a reward for information?
The authorities are willing to pay $50,000 for any tips that lead to a conviction.
