The Brigitte Macron gender scandal of 2025 has escalated when Emmanuel Macron, the President of France, and his wife filed a lawsuit in the US. The Emmanuel Macron’s wife defamation case is anchored on the allegations made by American commentator Candace Owens, who has allegedly said that the French First Lady is a man who was born male.
Defamation Lawsuit in the United States
In July 2025, Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron sued Owens in defamation in the United States. The case accuses the influencer of ignoring hard evidence and instead opting to believe the conspiracy theories about the French First Lady.
The Macrons claim that Owens has disseminated incorrect information through intentionality, disregarding the established facts. In their case, they state that she used fringe sources and internet personalities who have already been dismissed in France to propagate the same assertions. The US legal filing follows on the ruling in a previous case, made by a French court of appeal last month, that determined against two bloggers who had initially propagated thegender rumor.
The attorneys of Owens retaliated by submitting a motion to dismiss. They claim that the suit cannot be put to trial in Delaware because it directly does not concern her businesses, which are incorporated in the state. She would rapidly go broke and face operational distress defending the lawsuit in Delaware, which she asserts in her counsel.
Brigitte Macron is to give Evidence
The lawyer of Macron, Tom Clare, affirmed that Brigitte Macron will give photographic and scientific evidence in the court of law. This was a very uncomfortable choice that he made, but it is also evidence of her will to put a stop to the scandal.
Clare further included that the couple will be carrying evidence of her pregnancies and home life. He added further that expert witness testimony will be involved, and the scientific evidence is hoped to put the issue to rest permanently. Even though the attorney was unwilling to disclose information at this point in time, he pointed out that the Macrons are insistent on contesting the charges in a courtroom.
Brigitte Macron, aged 70 now, has been quoted as saying the allegations are incredibly disturbing. According to her lawyer, submission of intimate personal evidence is going to be hard to do, but she is resolved to proceed since she wants to spare her image.
The sources of the Gender Rumours
It was initially revealed in 2021, with a YouTube video by French YouTuber Amandine Roy and Natacha Rey stating that Brigitte Macron was born a man. They claimed that she was her brother, Jean-Michel Trogneux, in reality, and lied about her own life.
These accusations trended on social media and were subsequently enhanced by political opinion leaders such as Owens. In 2024, the Macrons are prosecuted against two French bloggers and lose the case in the first instance, but the case is reversed in 2025. The Court of Appeal ruled that the freedom of expression justified the right of the bloggers to make the allegations regardless of whether they were true or false. That decision is being made to look good by the Macrons.
Owens, who used to be a contributor on the conservative news platform Daily Wire, has been going on air with the gossip to her millions of followers. In March 2024, she vowed, on the statement that Brigitte Macron was a man, to put her whole career on it.
Emmanuel Macron Reacts to the Rumors
Emmanuel Macron addressed the scandal in a Paris Match interview this year. He claimed that the lawsuit was under the pretext of protecting his honour as well as that of his family.
He referred to the accusations as intentional misinformation used to cause harm and attributed them to the powers of far-right ideologies. He pointed out that it was not only a personal problem, but also political due to the possibility of disinformation operations, which could be employed to destabilize leaders and their families.
Macron confirmed the pressure his wife had been going through but made sure she was firm in sustaining through the current ordeal. He also said that although he was keen on continuing as the president, the persistence of the rumors was a significant setback to his home life.
US Court Proceedings Ahead
The defamation suit in the US is also a new legal conflict for both parties. In the case of Macron, it is to pass the high legal test used in the US courts. The party claiming public figures has to show actual malice, i.e., that the defendant was aware that the accusation made was false or acted with a carefree attitude to the truth.
Owens has claimed that her remarks should be subjected to the notion of free speech. She has insisted that she is quite sincere about her belief in the allegations and that she feels the right to speak out about such views is the most basic one. Her lawyers are seeking to have the case dismissed prior to its hearing in court.
In case the case moves forward, then both parties will come forward with significant evidence. The move made by the Macrons to display personal records and scientific findings is an evident change as it demonstrates that they are eager to disprove the allegations themselves.
Wider Reactions to the Case
The case also caused international coverage not only because of the people involved but also because of the sensitive nature of the allegations. The case of defamation between international leaders and their wives is a very unique occurrence, particularly when they demand the revelation of personal confidential information.
As it is observed, the case is also raising wider concerns on the subject of misinformation, social media conspiracy theories, and the freedom of speech in the internet era. The inclusion of a high-profile US commentator in the mix has made the row into transatlantic jurisdictional territory, and the issues of jurisdiction and responsibility are consequently brought up.
The fact that Brigitte Macron insisted on giving such evidence privately in this manner demonstrates how seriously the couple takes the issue. Although they do not feel comfortable, they consider it important to undergo the exercise to end the persistent rumination and regain confidence in the reality that is there.
Final Thoughts
The Brigitte Macron gender controversy 2025 continues to unfold as Emmanuel Macron’s wife’s defamation case rages on in America. The French First Lady is prepared to table photographic and scientific proof to dispute conspiracy theories about her for decades.
It is now up to the US courts to find out whether the claims made by Owens will rise to a defamation under the law of the US. The judicial process is likely to be closely monitored across France, the United States, and the world, with both parties entrenching themselves.
FAQs on Brigitte Macron Gender Controversy 2025
1: What is the Brigitte Macron gender controversy 2025?
The controversy involves false claims that French First Lady Brigitte Macron was born male. These claims are now the subject of a US defamation lawsuit.
2: Who is Candace Owens, and why is she involved in the case?
Candace Owens is a US right-wing commentator accused of spreading gender claims about Brigitte Macron, leading to the Macrons’ defamation lawsuit in 2025.
3: What evidence will Brigitte Macron present in court?
Her lawyer confirmed that photographic and scientific evidence, including proof of her pregnancies and family life, will be presented in the US court.
4: Why did the Macrons file the defamation case in the United States?
They argue Owens ignored verified facts and chose to spread conspiracy theories. The lawsuit was filed in the US, where Owens has her main audience.
5: What happened in the earlier French court cases about the rumours?
In 2024, the Macrons won a defamation case against French bloggers, but the ruling was overturned on appeal in 2025 on freedom of expression grounds.
6: What must the Macrons prove in the US defamation case?
As public figures, they must show “actual malice,” meaning Owens knowingly spread false claims or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
